|
Post by ronnierocketago on May 27, 2009 2:17:49 GMT
LOOOOOOL! I only read the first and last sentences of your post. Jesus fuck. One can only do you the favour of assuming you're baiting... And that's why I love you RNL, because you're dependably knee-jerk.
|
|
|
Post by ronnierocketago on May 27, 2009 2:26:39 GMT
LMFAO! Seriously (if I may use that word), I've just spat saliva all over my keyboard. Not that there was any blow to be cushioned, but if it helps, I did admit my post was pedantic before I even set out to say anything. arcane grammar rules constructed by a capitalist elitist paradigm of which enculturered.... Damn. Shit. Anyway, end of discussion. (Though somehow, something tells me it isn't.) What else you expected from me your local American pseudo-intellectual? No I respect that you were only trying to correct me on the right path, and you were right about the term's proper definition. Or in short, you're Che in Cuba. I'm afraid RNL is risking being Che in Bolivia....though with that recent Spielberg chatter, those roles could be switched? Time me to ponder in my Pretentious Chamber.
|
|
RNL
Global Moderator
Posts: 6,624
|
Post by RNL on May 27, 2009 2:26:42 GMT
I'm sorry, it's nearly impossible to tell your serious arguments from your jokes.
|
|
|
Post by ronnierocketago on May 27, 2009 2:29:44 GMT
I'm sorry, it's nearly impossible to tell your serious arguments from your jokes. Hook Line Subtlety.
|
|
RNL
Global Moderator
Posts: 6,624
|
Post by RNL on May 27, 2009 2:35:50 GMT
So... it's self-parody then.
|
|
|
Post by ronnierocketago on May 27, 2009 2:37:33 GMT
So... it's self-parody then. More like a bipartisan parody.
|
|
RNL
Global Moderator
Posts: 6,624
|
Post by RNL on May 27, 2009 2:54:22 GMT
You're not being clever.
You just acknowledged that your inane 'bait' argument in this thread is only distinguishable from your seriously intended arguments elsewhere by its 'subtleties', which would imply that you're acknowledging the inanity of those seriously intended arguments.
About time too.
|
|
|
Post by ronnierocketago on May 27, 2009 3:05:40 GMT
Who said I was? You're giving me too much credit, even if you don't mean to. You just acknowledged that your inane 'bait' argument in this thread is only distinguishable from your seriously intended arguments elsewhere by its 'subtleties', which would imply that you're acknowledging the inanity of those seriously intended arguments. Am I? And I never ever wrote the word 'subtleties.' That's too blunt and overt for my taste. How about Gonzo? That suites me more, at least in my own pretentious self-relection. I'll give you this, you're always reliable and always on time.
|
|
RNL
Global Moderator
Posts: 6,624
|
Post by RNL on May 27, 2009 13:58:56 GMT
This is trolling, Ronnie. Stop behaving like an imbecile.
|
|
|
Post by ronnierocketago on May 27, 2009 16:31:37 GMT
This is trolling, Ronnie. Stop behaving like an imbecile. I will, if you tell me what you think of my suggested new term, and back on topic? To give Capo credit, at least he contributed something to fill up this cinema vocabulary abyss. Then again, Predecessor isn't that bad of a term, I just wish we could have something more...unique, or specialized. Then again, in slight retuning, how about Cincestor? Also....wasn't this thread called Miscellaneous Film Discussion, or have I gone blind lately? I say that because I must say, this posting you're reading right now in general is not trolling. It's Miscellaneous.
|
|
RNL
Global Moderator
Posts: 6,624
|
Post by RNL on May 27, 2009 18:17:26 GMT
I'm not really interested in coining useless jargon. But knock yourself out.
'Predecessor' is a perfectly appropriate and unambiguous word.
And, no, you were trolling.
|
|
|
Post by ronnierocketago on May 27, 2009 22:34:29 GMT
I'm not really interested in coining useless jargon. But knock yourself out. 'Predecessor' is a perfectly appropriate and unambiguous word. And, no, you were trolling. How about Predequel?
|
|
|
Post by Michael on May 28, 2009 0:45:52 GMT
Haven't had any real discussion at this place in ages.
What can we talk about?
|
|
RNL
Global Moderator
Posts: 6,624
|
Post by RNL on May 28, 2009 1:02:03 GMT
Yo don't front this is a real discussion.
|
|
|
Post by ronnierocketago on May 28, 2009 2:19:18 GMT
Yo don't front this is a real discussion. Huh?
|
|
|
Post by ronnierocketago on May 28, 2009 2:20:11 GMT
Haven't had any real discussion at this place in ages. What can we talk about? Best action movie of this decade? I say BOURNE ULTIMATUM, though its not locked into stone on my ballot. Shit Capo, we should still try a FCM Awards special edition for this decade. That would be great fun, and great arguments.
|
|
|
Post by ronnierocketago on May 28, 2009 2:28:50 GMT
Also, It's official:
Predequel
This new awesome term created by Capo and yours truely. We indeed have the world a better place to live in.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on May 28, 2009 16:54:12 GMT
Yo don't front this is a real discussion.
|
|
|
Post by ronnierocketago on May 28, 2009 17:18:38 GMT
That's a great jpg. Too bad I'm sorta retarded beyond the basic computer functions.
|
|
Capo
Administrator
Posts: 7,847
|
Post by Capo on May 29, 2009 16:57:48 GMT
Also, It's official: PredequelThis new awesome term created by Capo and yours truely. We indeed have the world a better place to live in.
|
|