Post by Jenson71 on Mar 3, 2010 23:58:45 GMT
I thought this was a somewhat useful, romantic guide at a more responsible, thoughtful viewership of film, mostly as art:
www.moviemaker.com/directing/article/how_to_watch_a_movie_2988/
(Not including introduction)
Here are some basic elements to be aware of when viewing a film:
1) Direction. When watching a film, always ask: Does the director have control, in the sense that it is his or her vision you're seeing? As Hitchcock once said: “At times, I have the feeling I'm an orchestra conductor, a trumpet sound corresponding to a close shot and a distant shot suggesting an entire orchestra performing a muted accompaniment. At other times, by using colors and lights in front of beautiful landscapes, I feel I am a painter.”
Great directors such as Hitchcock, Kurosawa, Polanski, Kubrick and Scorsese, to name a few, have been accused of being “control freaks” when making their movies. Technicians as well as artists, these directors who maintain control have studied every aspect of the process. Every section of their films is developed and presented with precision. Nothing escapes a great director's eye, nor should it escape yours.
Suggested viewing: Citizen Kane (1941), Vertigo (1958) and Chinatown (1974)
2) Screenplay. Even a great director will struggle with his or her vision if the screenplay is not sound. The old saw is still true: “If it ain't on the page, it ain't on the stage.” What's on paper, then, is an essential element of film. Originality, creativity, logical narrative and plot, continuity, composition and development of three-dimensional characters are some of the key ingredients in a good screenplay. In other words, does the screenplay effectively communicate a story through dramatic action and dialogue? The so-called “acts of God” or leaps of faith used by many screenwriters to find bridges between scenes are not found in the best screenplays. Transitions in scenes should make sense. If not, film continuity fails.
Some of our greatest authors have written for the screen, including F. Scott Fitzgerald, William Faulkner and Graham Greene. Some newcomers who seem to have mastered the screenwriting craft include Alan Ball, M. Night Shyamalan, Andrew Kevin Walker and Darren Aronofsky.
Suggested viewing: The Big Sleep (1946), Amadeus (1984) and Fargo (1996)
3) Cinematography. Although they're much more, movies are primarily visual experiences. The Europeans (and a few Amercian legends such as Ford and Welles) understood this from the beginning. The great Italian directors such as Antonioni, Bertolucci and Fellini epitomized visuality in their films. The astute cinematographer understands the fundamental relationship between the camera and the human eye. Maybe more importantly, they realize the camera is an extension of the human eye. Thus, viewers should watch for cinematographers whose camera is never static; where the camera transforms itself into the eyes of the viewer.
Suggested viewing: Shane (1953), Kundun (1997) and Signs (2002)
4) Editing. Good directors shoot much more film than they can possibly use. It's the editor's job to realize a film's potential. Creative editing is not merely visual, but aural. For instance, music or extraneous noise can be used to create the illusion of continuity. Astute directors are intimately involved in the editing process to assure smooth transitioning in the flow of the film and to ensure that their film creates a seamless whole. This is no small task, since the standard fiction feature can be composed of as many as 1,000 separate shots.
Suggested viewing: The French Connection (1971), Blue Velvet (1986) and A Pure Formality (1994)
5) Acting. Judging good acting is, of course, like recognizing obscenity—you simply know it when you see it. Some actors are consistent craftsmen, while others are largely the creation of strong directors. What we know about many exceptional performers is that they do not “act.” They return to us film after film, completely submerged in their characterizations. This intensity, combined with a memorable face, is what some have called “star quality.” Humphrey Bogart's craggy countenance, with his immobile upper lip, mannerisms and ticks, marked his appearances on the screen. There are others who hide themselves in their characters. Montgomery Clift, Marlon Brando and James Dean blazed the path for actors such as these. Robert De Niro, Christopher Walken, Meryl Streep, Al Pacino and Edward Norton exemplify this type of acting. Watch and identify the elements that constitute a great performance.
Suggested viewing: Bogart in The Maltese Falcon (1941), De Niro in Raging Bull (1980) and Ellen Burstyn in Requiem for a Dream (2000)
6) Lighting and Sets. As the German Expressionists have shown, the entire mood of a film can be determined by lighting, the way shadows fall, the type of sets used or the actual location where the film is shot. One cannot imagine The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari without these ingredients. The Hollywood film noir classics of the 1940s inherited this concept and created a magnificent, lasting and influential genre. The amount and style of lighting depends on the type of film being made, but the effect of hard lighting and shadows in horror films, for example, can create a stark, emotional response in the audience. This was used effectively in Hitchcock's Psycho, as a single, swaying light bulb reveals a mummified figure—to the audience's macabre delight. Kubrick and Welles were masters of the use of light. More recently, this skill can be seen in the work of director Ridley Scott.
Suggested viewing: The Third Man (1949), Blade Runner (1982) and Seven (1995)
7) Special (Visual) Effects. Movies have always had special effects, but with the pervasiveness of new technologies many believe that film has entered a somewhat troublesome era. With computer-generated special effects, young moviemakers increasingly believe that actors (and even stories) are not required. The danger is that special effects in film are becoming like fireworks—sound and fury, light and noise, but no substance. If there is any threat to film as an art form, it is the unrestrained use of technologically-heightened special effects. Except for where it is absolutely essential to the plot, no film's success should hinge on its effects.
Suggested viewing: Jurassic Park (1993), Forrest Gump (1994) and The Matrix (1999)
8) Soundtrack. Sometimes the best soundtrack is none at all; at other times, the right musical accent in a scene elevates the film and allows the viewer to relate to the characters or story on a deeper level. While a good soundtrack should never be overwhelming, many classic films would be far less memorable without their soundtracks. One example is Carol Reed's The Third Man. What would the film be without Anton Karas' haunting zither score? Amadeus is a similar case. Without the near-perfect touch of Mozart's music, the film would never be the classic that it is.
Though it's true that the best soundtrack is often so subtle that it is almost unnoticeable to a viewer's ears, the opposite can also be true. Who could argue that without the thumping beat of John Williams' Jaws score, that film's ability to scare would be far diminished.
Suggested viewing: Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956), The Graduate (1967) and Jaws (1975)
There are, of course, other elements of cinema that can be just as significant as those mentioned here. The point is that cinema is our most influential art form, and thinking viewers should take care not to be mindless consumers of popular culture in general, and cinema in particular. Although movies do divert us from the reality of the everyday, they can do much more. We need only to develop the critic within us in order to elevate our celluloid experiences. MM
www.moviemaker.com/directing/article/how_to_watch_a_movie_2988/
(Not including introduction)
Here are some basic elements to be aware of when viewing a film:
1) Direction. When watching a film, always ask: Does the director have control, in the sense that it is his or her vision you're seeing? As Hitchcock once said: “At times, I have the feeling I'm an orchestra conductor, a trumpet sound corresponding to a close shot and a distant shot suggesting an entire orchestra performing a muted accompaniment. At other times, by using colors and lights in front of beautiful landscapes, I feel I am a painter.”
Great directors such as Hitchcock, Kurosawa, Polanski, Kubrick and Scorsese, to name a few, have been accused of being “control freaks” when making their movies. Technicians as well as artists, these directors who maintain control have studied every aspect of the process. Every section of their films is developed and presented with precision. Nothing escapes a great director's eye, nor should it escape yours.
Suggested viewing: Citizen Kane (1941), Vertigo (1958) and Chinatown (1974)
2) Screenplay. Even a great director will struggle with his or her vision if the screenplay is not sound. The old saw is still true: “If it ain't on the page, it ain't on the stage.” What's on paper, then, is an essential element of film. Originality, creativity, logical narrative and plot, continuity, composition and development of three-dimensional characters are some of the key ingredients in a good screenplay. In other words, does the screenplay effectively communicate a story through dramatic action and dialogue? The so-called “acts of God” or leaps of faith used by many screenwriters to find bridges between scenes are not found in the best screenplays. Transitions in scenes should make sense. If not, film continuity fails.
Some of our greatest authors have written for the screen, including F. Scott Fitzgerald, William Faulkner and Graham Greene. Some newcomers who seem to have mastered the screenwriting craft include Alan Ball, M. Night Shyamalan, Andrew Kevin Walker and Darren Aronofsky.
Suggested viewing: The Big Sleep (1946), Amadeus (1984) and Fargo (1996)
3) Cinematography. Although they're much more, movies are primarily visual experiences. The Europeans (and a few Amercian legends such as Ford and Welles) understood this from the beginning. The great Italian directors such as Antonioni, Bertolucci and Fellini epitomized visuality in their films. The astute cinematographer understands the fundamental relationship between the camera and the human eye. Maybe more importantly, they realize the camera is an extension of the human eye. Thus, viewers should watch for cinematographers whose camera is never static; where the camera transforms itself into the eyes of the viewer.
Suggested viewing: Shane (1953), Kundun (1997) and Signs (2002)
4) Editing. Good directors shoot much more film than they can possibly use. It's the editor's job to realize a film's potential. Creative editing is not merely visual, but aural. For instance, music or extraneous noise can be used to create the illusion of continuity. Astute directors are intimately involved in the editing process to assure smooth transitioning in the flow of the film and to ensure that their film creates a seamless whole. This is no small task, since the standard fiction feature can be composed of as many as 1,000 separate shots.
Suggested viewing: The French Connection (1971), Blue Velvet (1986) and A Pure Formality (1994)
5) Acting. Judging good acting is, of course, like recognizing obscenity—you simply know it when you see it. Some actors are consistent craftsmen, while others are largely the creation of strong directors. What we know about many exceptional performers is that they do not “act.” They return to us film after film, completely submerged in their characterizations. This intensity, combined with a memorable face, is what some have called “star quality.” Humphrey Bogart's craggy countenance, with his immobile upper lip, mannerisms and ticks, marked his appearances on the screen. There are others who hide themselves in their characters. Montgomery Clift, Marlon Brando and James Dean blazed the path for actors such as these. Robert De Niro, Christopher Walken, Meryl Streep, Al Pacino and Edward Norton exemplify this type of acting. Watch and identify the elements that constitute a great performance.
Suggested viewing: Bogart in The Maltese Falcon (1941), De Niro in Raging Bull (1980) and Ellen Burstyn in Requiem for a Dream (2000)
6) Lighting and Sets. As the German Expressionists have shown, the entire mood of a film can be determined by lighting, the way shadows fall, the type of sets used or the actual location where the film is shot. One cannot imagine The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari without these ingredients. The Hollywood film noir classics of the 1940s inherited this concept and created a magnificent, lasting and influential genre. The amount and style of lighting depends on the type of film being made, but the effect of hard lighting and shadows in horror films, for example, can create a stark, emotional response in the audience. This was used effectively in Hitchcock's Psycho, as a single, swaying light bulb reveals a mummified figure—to the audience's macabre delight. Kubrick and Welles were masters of the use of light. More recently, this skill can be seen in the work of director Ridley Scott.
Suggested viewing: The Third Man (1949), Blade Runner (1982) and Seven (1995)
7) Special (Visual) Effects. Movies have always had special effects, but with the pervasiveness of new technologies many believe that film has entered a somewhat troublesome era. With computer-generated special effects, young moviemakers increasingly believe that actors (and even stories) are not required. The danger is that special effects in film are becoming like fireworks—sound and fury, light and noise, but no substance. If there is any threat to film as an art form, it is the unrestrained use of technologically-heightened special effects. Except for where it is absolutely essential to the plot, no film's success should hinge on its effects.
Suggested viewing: Jurassic Park (1993), Forrest Gump (1994) and The Matrix (1999)
8) Soundtrack. Sometimes the best soundtrack is none at all; at other times, the right musical accent in a scene elevates the film and allows the viewer to relate to the characters or story on a deeper level. While a good soundtrack should never be overwhelming, many classic films would be far less memorable without their soundtracks. One example is Carol Reed's The Third Man. What would the film be without Anton Karas' haunting zither score? Amadeus is a similar case. Without the near-perfect touch of Mozart's music, the film would never be the classic that it is.
Though it's true that the best soundtrack is often so subtle that it is almost unnoticeable to a viewer's ears, the opposite can also be true. Who could argue that without the thumping beat of John Williams' Jaws score, that film's ability to scare would be far diminished.
Suggested viewing: Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956), The Graduate (1967) and Jaws (1975)
There are, of course, other elements of cinema that can be just as significant as those mentioned here. The point is that cinema is our most influential art form, and thinking viewers should take care not to be mindless consumers of popular culture in general, and cinema in particular. Although movies do divert us from the reality of the everyday, they can do much more. We need only to develop the critic within us in order to elevate our celluloid experiences. MM
