|
Post by Vercetti on Dec 13, 2005 0:44:34 GMT
Quentin Tarantino (1963- )Pulp Fiction Reservoir Dogs Jackie Brown Kill Bill V2 Kill Bill V1
|
|
RNL
Global Moderator
Posts: 6,624
|
Post by RNL on Dec 13, 2005 1:40:50 GMT
1. Pulp Fiction (1994) 8/10 2. Jackie Brown (1997) 6/10 3. Reservoir Dogs (1992) 5/10 4. Death Proof (2007) 3/10 5. Kill Bill Volume 1 (2003) 3/10 6. Kill Bill Volume 2 (2004) 3/10
|
|
jrod
Ghost writer
Posts: 970
|
Post by jrod on Dec 13, 2005 5:30:43 GMT
Pulp Fiction Reservoir Dogs Jackie Brown Kill Bill Volume 1 Kill Bill Volume 2
|
|
Capo
Administrator
Posts: 7,847
|
Post by Capo on Dec 13, 2005 20:18:57 GMT
1. Pulp Fiction 1994 2. Reservoir Dogs 1991 3. Jackie Brown 1997 4. Kill Bill Vol. 1 2003 5. Kill Bill Vol. 2 2004
|
|
|
Post by Driver on Dec 14, 2005 19:20:27 GMT
|
|
Pherdy
Ghost writer
Posts: 596
|
Post by Pherdy on Dec 29, 2005 12:56:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ronnierocketago on Jan 10, 2006 15:06:49 GMT
RESERVOIR DOGS - Masterpiece - ***** PULP FICTION - Masterpiece - ***** JACKIE BROWN - **** KILL BILL VOL.1 - *** ----- ------ VOL. 2 - ***1/2
|
|
Omar
Global Moderator
Professione: reporter
Posts: 2,770
|
Post by Omar on Jan 10, 2006 15:11:08 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Mike Sullivan on Jan 10, 2006 16:15:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by johndav on Jan 25, 2006 18:24:59 GMT
Pulp Fiction 8/10 (suffers a bit from over-familiarity + imitations) Jackie Brown 6.5/10 Reservoir Dogs 4/10 Kill Bill 1 2.5/10 (i'm sorry, but the influence Lady Snowblood- not exactly a masterpiece- is far superior. I do wish QT would show a bit more maturity, but then i'm a middle-aged fogey. He needs more life in his films + less films in his life)
|
|
|
Post by ronnierocketago on Jan 25, 2006 20:21:41 GMT
Actually, one could actually make a case that Tarantino as a director has gotten worse of sorts as he has gone along.
RESERVOIR DOGS is a fine example of an amateur and inexperienced, yet fluent film nerd being given the camera and many talented actors....and prevailing with such an energy in the narrative that of which has been sapping away as the more "experienced" he has become behind the camera. Truely, inexperience was a benefit to him there.
However, QT is still cool in my book, and truely even those that dislike him have to agree that he is among the top "brand-name" filmmakers out there in Hollywood, along with Spielberg and others.
|
|
jrod
Ghost writer
Posts: 970
|
Post by jrod on Jan 25, 2006 20:51:58 GMT
I too enjoy his older stuff more. Some directors make much better films when their work is so "raw"
Mean Streets and Taxi Driver for example, are much better then Aviator and Gangs of New York
|
|
|
Post by mikola on Apr 30, 2006 17:33:11 GMT
|
|
Jenson71
Ghost writer
Bush is watching you
Posts: 810
|
Post by Jenson71 on May 3, 2006 18:34:35 GMT
I really like his Kill Bills, and don't see the greatness in Pulp Fiction/Dogs that much.
|
|
Boz
Published writer
Posts: 1,451
|
Post by Boz on Aug 17, 2006 17:08:47 GMT
1. Pulp Fiction (1994) 2. Reservoir Dogs (1992) 3. Kill Bill (2003) 4. Kill Bill Vol. 2 (2004) 5. Jackie Brown (1997)
|
|
Blib
Ghost writer
Posts: 623
|
Post by Blib on Nov 24, 2007 19:17:14 GMT
Pulp Fiction (1994) - Reservoir Dogs (1992) Kill Bill: Vol. 2 (2004) - Jackie Brown (1997) - Kill Bill: Vol. 1 (2003) - Death Proof (2007) - Four Rooms (his segment) (1995) -
|
|
|
Post by svsg on Nov 24, 2007 19:20:11 GMT
Pulp Fiction Kill Bill 2 Death Proof
|
|
|
Post by bobbyreed on Jun 20, 2008 20:49:32 GMT
|
|
Jenson71
Ghost writer
Bush is watching you
Posts: 810
|
Post by Jenson71 on Jun 20, 2008 21:51:52 GMT
I can't believe some of the low ratings for Kill Bill. That movie is so entertaining. I love it.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Sullivan on Jun 20, 2008 23:47:38 GMT
He's so fucking indulgant at this point. We know his love of trash cinema like the grindhouse era films. But in his homage, he can't seem to grasp the feel or look of the original Grindhouse films. Tarrantino used to be strikingly original in my eyes. I love Pulp Fiction and Reservoir Dogs. They're great films; great diolouge and a wonderful almagum of many different cinematic ideas. But he really hasn't done anything worth a damn since Pulp Fiction; a landmark in film history. But I sense that he's quit trying to push his boundaries. Other filmmakers of his generation have surpassed him in consistency and content. Think of Chris Nolan, a film maker who has yet to make a false move.
Anyone else agree.
|
|