Capo
Administrator
Posts: 7,847
|
Post by Capo on Nov 28, 2005 0:50:07 GMT
_1. Weekend 1967 _2. Éloge de l'amour 2001 _3. Contempt 1963 _4. Tout va Bien 1972 _5. Band of Outsiders 1964 _6. Breathless 1959 _7. Pierrot le fou 1965 _8. Alphaville 1965 _9. First Name: Carmen 1983 10. A Woman is a Woman 1969 11. The Small Soldier 1960 12. Détective 1985 13. Passion 1982 14. Notre musique 2004 15. La Chinoise 1967 16. Masculine Feminine 1966 17. Vivre sa vie 1962 18. Sympathy for the Devil 1968 19. Made in U.S.A. 1966 20. 2 or 3 Things I Know About Her 1967 21. Slow Motion 1979 22. British Sounds 1969 23. Les Carabiniers 1963 24. Charlotte and Her Jules 195825. All the Boys Are Called Patrick 195726. Wind from the East 197027. Pravda 1969
|
|
Capo
Administrator
Posts: 7,847
|
Post by Capo on Dec 7, 2005 16:17:53 GMT
I cannot quite express the effect Godard has on me. Not just as a filmwatcher, or filmmaker, but in terms of my outlook on life in general, and Art in particular. I've just watched the DVD of Weekend, including the Raoul Coutard interview and the Mike Figgis essay. Figgis voices many of my unexpressed thoughts on the guy, and particular when watching his films...
...there are moments, when watching a Godard film, that border on boredom. Figgis says he has no problem with this; it's an interesting boredom, which he'd choose anyday over a boringly entertaining film. I paraphrased there to suit my own wording, and to come back to my old signature, which quoted Clownation: "I'd rather see an interesting failure than a mundane success."
Not to say Godard's films are failures. Quite the opposite. To me, they are anything but; a critic-proof critic simply playing games. Why is he critic-proof? Because he seeks no critics; he abandons them and his audience; his loyalties lie elsewhere...to his chosen medium, to his art.
I wish I could meet him some day.
|
|
Omar
Global Moderator
Professione: reporter
Posts: 2,770
|
Post by Omar on Jan 3, 2006 3:49:24 GMT
|
|
Omar
Global Moderator
Professione: reporter
Posts: 2,770
|
Post by Omar on Jan 14, 2006 5:53:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Vercetti on Feb 13, 2006 17:28:44 GMT
1960: À bout de souffle Breathless 1967: Week End
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Feb 21, 2006 3:53:54 GMT
Capo, for the life of me I cannot understand how you prefer Weekend over Breathless, but to each his own I guess.
|
|
Capo
Administrator
Posts: 7,847
|
Post by Capo on Feb 21, 2006 9:49:53 GMT
Two very different films; one quite clearly a directorial feature debut, with the director playing with his brush and colours to re-paint something which had inspired him to make films--American B gangster flicks (the film is dedicated to Monogram). Splashed into this is much philosophy, which Godard jump-cuts with to make even more interesting, or frustrating, depending on taste. A bout de souffle is definitely the more easily accessible film, easier to re-watch and get "into". But Weekend, for me, paints an entirely different picture altogether. More ambitious, far more confident, and, as with Pierrot le fou (so I've heard) it is the film in which Godard tries to do everything. It's much more cinematically inventive, creating visuals you've not seen anywhere else. Both have proved to be endlessly inspiring, perhaps his two most inspiring films to date. And I rate them both with four stars.
Why do you prefer A bout de souffle?
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Feb 21, 2006 19:39:44 GMT
Weekend is a very ambiguous film, which is good, but I felt it dragged on in certain places, making me feel very bored and uninterested. I loved A bout de souffle's fast pace, witty dialogue, and the jump cuts were brilliant. It was also a very ambiguous film, much like Weekend. I felt Godard used Michel as a symbol for France, and Patricia as a symbol for America, perhaps to show his discontent for both nations, considering they were neither very admirable characters.
|
|
Capo
Administrator
Posts: 7,847
|
Post by Capo on Feb 21, 2006 21:51:45 GMT
I think every Godard film has its "yawns". They're interesting yawns, but lulls in the narrative nevertheless. The pleasure in sitting through them is that you know, sooner or later, that the film will explode into something far beyond words and give you a feeling no other film does. Another reason why I like to liken Godard to von Trier, whose work I find very much in the same vain. After watching A bout de souffle many times (perhaps more than any other), I find it dull in parts, too, just as with Weekend.
Weekend's "boredom", though, comes from its intensity, from its constant reinvention of images, so that it's always an engaging "boredom", like, say, the camera circling the courtyard several times while the farmer plays the piano, or the white and black "brothers" echoing one another's thoughts on the world while the other eats away; while A bout de souffle's stems from running out of things to say after rewatches. I find Godard's first film to be, while still fresh to me, as jejune as the iris fades it utilises in comparison to Weekend.
I also think, for what it's worth, that A bout de souffle is a "surface" film, all about style, with the director not as confident in brash, unsubtle philosophies as he would prove to be by 1967. But I'm comparing his two best films, here, and because of that I'm sounding like I prefer one far more over the other. Needless to say, these films are only two of a mere sixteen which stand on my four-star list.
I'd be interested to see how you rate his other films. For a change of pace altogether, lying somewhere between the two films we've been discussing, check out Le mépris (Contempt), another fine, colourful masterpiece.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Feb 21, 2006 22:18:23 GMT
I'm definitely interested in seeing as many Godard films as I possibly can. The one that most intrigues me is Vivre sa vie.
This is actually one of my favorite scenes in the film. The one that bores me the most is when Corrine is talking about her erotic "dream." I felt that scene was longer than it needed to be.
|
|
Capo
Administrator
Posts: 7,847
|
Post by Capo on Feb 22, 2006 20:32:30 GMT
The one that bores me the most is when Corrine is talking about her erotic "dream." I felt that scene was longer than it needed to be. I love this scene; the camerawork, how subtle it is, and Godard's (funny) use of music, which comes in at the most dramatically mundane parts of the monologue, something he does in Alphaville too.
|
|
|
Post by Vercetti on Feb 22, 2006 20:41:12 GMT
My two favorite scenes in Week End have to be the tracking shot of the traffic jam and the scene where the truck drivers eat while the other goes on with a monologue.
Another scene I loved out of it's depiction of upper class people is relatively early on when the woman is in a car accident, killing her boyfriend and she keeps on patronizing the farmer.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Feb 22, 2006 21:02:01 GMT
Another scene I loved out of it's depiction of upper class people is relatively early on when the woman is in a car accident, killing her boyfriend and she keeps on patronizing the farmer. Yeah, I loved that too.
|
|
Omar
Global Moderator
Professione: reporter
Posts: 2,770
|
Post by Omar on Mar 10, 2006 3:59:05 GMT
|
|
|
Post by arizonajules on Mar 17, 2006 6:31:12 GMT
This is actually one of my favorite scenes in the film. The one that bores me the most is when Corrine is talking about her erotic "dream." I felt that scene was longer than it needed to be. Like much of Godard's dialogue (especially in Weekend), the text from that scene was lifted straight from a novel (you'll have to forgive me, I've blanked on the novel!). I think that that inter-textuality is one of the main reasons for the extreme length of that scene.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Apr 3, 2006 19:59:22 GMT
Godard is quickly becoming one of my faves.
|
|
Capo
Administrator
Posts: 7,847
|
Post by Capo on Apr 21, 2006 22:23:55 GMT
How come the Godard boxsets are suddenly unavailable? I have the first, but am now regretting not purchasing the second.
|
|
jake
Writer's block
Posts: 215
|
Post by jake on May 13, 2006 14:14:05 GMT
After seeing Slow Motion, I have been inspired to rewatch all his work. I think I'll like them a lot more now. 1. Weekend (1967) 2. À bout de souffle (1959) 3. JLG/JLG -- Autoportrait de Decembre (1995) 4. Sauve qui peut (la vie) (1980) 5. Made in U.S.A. (1966) 6. Une Femme Est Une Femme (1961) 7. Le Petit Soldat (1960)
|
|
Capo
Administrator
Posts: 7,847
|
Post by Capo on May 13, 2006 17:43:47 GMT
Good to hear, Jake. How much did you pay for your Slow Motion DVD (assuming you did)? I saw it for a staggering £24.99 in Virgin the other week. That's completely unjustified.
|
|
jake
Writer's block
Posts: 215
|
Post by jake on May 13, 2006 18:14:35 GMT
I agree, it is ridiculous. I would never pay that much for a single DVD, especially a bare bones edition.
I rented it from CD wow, I pay £14.99 a month for a maximum of three discs at one time, which suits me fine as I rarely watch more than one film a day. They have an extensive catalogue and it works out a lot cheaper than paying £2.50 a disc at my local library.
That being said, HMV occasionally have some excellent deals; I found Nostalghia, Andrei Rublev and Solaris all going for £11.99 recently, very rare to see them below £20 there.
Anyway back to Godard, Slow Motion was very impressive, as experimental as ever. Its a simultaneously satirical and despairing look at modern relationships, with important moments slowed down (I wonder if Wong Kar Wai saw this film?) and it seems to be a celebration of cinemas ability to capture every single flicker of movement and expression of the human face. It is also very funny, with Isabelle Huppert playing a prostitute, who completely is disinterested and has to be told when to groan in pleasure, whilst involved in a tryst with another woman and a man. Like I said, satirical and cynical. I liked it a lot.
|
|